Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:52

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Auto-Parts Bankruptcy Is the First Big Casualty of Tariff War - WSJ
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The dancing monk: Why mature people don’t chase total control - Big Think
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do you think there is growing support for far-right parties in Europe?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why are white women not interested in dating Asian men? Are they not attractive to you at all?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Notes and quotes from Day 2 of Raiders' 2025 mandatory minicamp - Las Vegas Raiders
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.